Ariocarpus

Primary tabs

Ariocarpus

Ariocarpus Scheidw. in Bull. Acad. Roy. Sci. Bruxelles 5: 491. 1838 sec. Vázquez-Sánchez & al. 20131 wfo-4000003041
      Type: Ariocarpus retusus Scheidw.
  • 1. Vázquez-Sánchez, Terrazas, T., Arias, S. & Ochoterena, H. 2013: Molecular phylogeny, origin and taxonomic implications of the tribe Cacteae (Cactaceae). – Systematics and Biodiversity 11(1): 103-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2013.775191
  • =Anhalonium Lem., Cact. Gen. Sp. Nov.: 1. 1839 syn. sec. TROPICOS 1988+2 wfo-4000002119
      • Type: Anhalonium prismaticum Lem.
  • 2. TROPICOS 1988+: Tropicos.org. Missouri Botanical Garden – https://tropicos.org.
  • =Stromatocactus Karw. ex Rümpler, Handb. Cacteenk., ed. 2: 229. 1885 syn. sec. Kew 20193 wfo-4000036907
  • –Stromatocarpus, nom. inval. syn. sec. Berendsohn 20214 wfo-4000036908
      • Type: Stromatocactus kotschoubeyi Karw. ex Rümpler, nom. inval.
  • 3. Kew 2019: Dataset export of the World Checklist of Vascular Plants database, dated 19 December. – Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, 4. Berendsohn, W. G. 2021: Revisions
  • =Neogomesia Castañeda in Cact. Succ. J. (Los Angeles) 13: 98. 1941 syn. sec. Hunt 20065 wfo-4000025695
      • Type: Neogomesia agavoides Castañeda
  • 5. Hunt, D.R. 2006: The New Cactus Lexicon. – Milborne Port: dh books
  • =Roseocactus A.Berger in J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 15: 45 syn. sec. Hunt 20066 wfo-4000033493
      • Type: Roseocactus fissuratus (Engelm.) A.Berger
  • 6. Hunt, D.R. 2006: The New Cactus Lexicon. – Milborne Port: dh books

Content

Notes

Phylogenetics: The monophyly of Ariocarpus was repeatedly confirmed (Butterworth & al. 2002; Bárcenas & al. 2011; Hérnandez-Hérnandez & al. 2011; Vázquez-Sánchez & al. 2013).A,B,C,D,E

Taxon standing

Category B. The genus is monophyletic based on phylogenetic studies that support the clade based on a sufficiently dense or even complete sampling, or support a monotypic genus as a distinct lineage, but do not provide a new taxonomic treatment at the species level. In many cases, older classical taxonomic synopses or a monographic treatment exist for these genera providing a reliable assessment of the species included.

Acknowledgments

Revised by Carlos Gómez-Hinostrosa & Héctor M. Hernández

Bibliography

A. Butterworth, C. A., Cota-Sanchez, J. H. & Wallace, R. S. 2002: Molecular systematics of tribe Cacteae (Cactaceae: Cactoideae): A phylogeny based on rpl16 intron sequence variation. – Systematic Botany 27(2): 257-270. https://doi.org/10.1043/0363-6445-27.2.257
B. Bárcenas, R.T., Yesson, C. & Hawkins, J. A. 2011: Molecular systematics of the Cactaceae. – Cladistics 27: 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00350.x
C. Hernández-Hernández, T., Hernández, H.M., De-Nova, J. A., Puente, R., Eguiarte, L.E. & Magallón, S. 2011: Phylogenetic relationships and evolution of growth form in Cactaceae (Caryophyllales, Eudicotyledoneae). – American Journal of Botany 98(1): 44-61. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1000129
D. Hernández-Ledesma, P., Berendsohn, W. G., Borsch, T., von Mering, S., Akhani, H., Arias, S., Castañeda-Noa, I., Eggli, U., Eriksson, R., Flores-Olvera, H., Fuentes-Bazán, S., Kadereit, G., Klak, C., Korotkova, N., Nyffeler, R., Ocampo, G. & Ochoterena, H. 2015: A taxonomic backbone for the global synthesis of species diversity in the angiosperm order Caryophyllales. – Willdenowia 45(3): 281-383. https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.45.45301
E. Vázquez-Sánchez, Terrazas, T., Arias, S. & Ochoterena, H. 2013: Molecular phylogeny, origin and taxonomic implications of the tribe Cacteae (Cactaceae). – Systematics and Biodiversity 11(1): 103-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2013.775191