Amaranthaceae
Amaranthaceae, Gen. Pl.: 87. 1789 sec. Hernández-Ledesma & al. 20151 wfo-7000000017
- Type: Amaranthus
- 1. Hernández-Ledesma, P., Berendsohn, W. G., Borsch, T., von Mering, S., Akhani, H., Arias, S., Castañeda-Noa, I., Eggli, U., Eriksson, R., Flores-Olvera, H., Fuentes-Bazán, S., Kadereit, G., Klak, C., Korotkova, N., Nyffeler, R., Ocampo, G. & Ochoterena, H. 2015: A taxonomic backbone for the global synthesis of species diversity in the angiosperm order Caryophyllales. – Willdenowia 45(3): 281-383. https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.45.45301
Content
Introduction
Amaranthaceae belong to a clade together with Chenopodiaceae. Support for the monophyly of the "Amaranthaceae-Chenopodiaceae alliance" is found consistently in all molecular phylogenetic analyses (Manhart & Rettig 1994; Downie & al. 1997; Cuénoud & al. 2002; Kadereit & al. 2003; Müller & Borsch 2005a; Schäferhoff & al. 2009; Brockington & al. 2009). The family circumscription of the Amaranthaceae in the sense of Schinz (1893) was upheld by Townsend (1993) and confirmed as monophyletic with high statistical confidence by Kadereit & al. (2003) and Müller & Borsch (2005a). Following this concept the Amaranthaceae predominantly occur in tropical and subtropical regions with most of the species diversity in the Neotropics, Eastern and Southern Africa and Australia (Müller & Borsch 2005a,b; Sanchez del-Pino & al. 2009). Subfamily Gomphrenoideae has been revealed as monophyletic and nested within the Amaranthoideae and is characterized by unilocular anthers (Sanchez del-Pino & al. 2009), and metareticulate pollen (Borsch & Barthlott 1998; in core Gomphrenoideae except Iresine R. Br., Irenella Suess. and Woehleria Griseb.). In contrast, subfamily Amaranthoideae is largely paraphyletic. The genera Bosea and Charpentiera were found as successive sisters to the remainder of the Amaranthaceae (Müller & Borsch 2005a). The Celosioideae (corresponding to the celosioid clade) are the only natural tribe in the pre-phylogenetic classification of the family and further major lineages are constituted by the amaranthoid clade (Amaranthus, Chamissoa and relatives), the aervoid clade (Aerva, Ptilotus and relatives) and the achyranthoid clade (Achyranthes, Centemposis, Cyathula, Pupalia, Sericocoma and many other African genera; Müller & Borsch 2005b).
The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (1998) proposed to apply the name Amaranthaceae to the complete Amaranthaceae-Chenopodiaceae alliance, essentially adopting the family concept of Baillon (1887) and Mallingson (1922). The broad family circumscription was also adopted in subsequent versions of the APG classification (APG II 2003; APG III 2009). However, since recent phylogenetic analyses rather indicate the monophyly of the core Chenopodiaceae but are just not yet conclusive about the position of the subfamily Polycnemoideae, the widely used family name Chenopodiaceae is maintained (see introduction to the family Chenopodiaceae). The four genera of the well-supported polycnemoid lineage (Hemichroa R. Br., Nitrophila S. Watson, Polycnemum L., Surreya R. Masson & G. Kadereit) that corresponds to the subfamily Polycnemoideae share petaloid tepals, two large bracteoles supporting the flower, an androecium that is basally united into a tube and bilocular anthers with the Amaranthaceae sensu Schinz (1893), Masson & Kadereit (2013). We are therefore provisionally treating this subfamily under the Amaranthaceae along with Endlicher (1841), Moquin-Tandon (1849) and Scott (1977).A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,I,J,K,L,M,N,O,P,Q,R,S,T,U,V
The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (1998) proposed to apply the name Amaranthaceae to the complete Amaranthaceae-Chenopodiaceae alliance, essentially adopting the family concept of Baillon (1887) and Mallingson (1922). The broad family circumscription was also adopted in subsequent versions of the APG classification (APG II 2003; APG III 2009). However, since recent phylogenetic analyses rather indicate the monophyly of the core Chenopodiaceae but are just not yet conclusive about the position of the subfamily Polycnemoideae, the widely used family name Chenopodiaceae is maintained (see introduction to the family Chenopodiaceae). The four genera of the well-supported polycnemoid lineage (Hemichroa R. Br., Nitrophila S. Watson, Polycnemum L., Surreya R. Masson & G. Kadereit) that corresponds to the subfamily Polycnemoideae share petaloid tepals, two large bracteoles supporting the flower, an androecium that is basally united into a tube and bilocular anthers with the Amaranthaceae sensu Schinz (1893), Masson & Kadereit (2013). We are therefore provisionally treating this subfamily under the Amaranthaceae along with Endlicher (1841), Moquin-Tandon (1849) and Scott (1977).A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,I,J,K,L,M,N,O,P,Q,R,S,T,U,V
Bibliography
A. APG II [Angiosperm Phylogeny Group] 2003: An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. – Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 141: 399-436. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1095-8339.2003.t01-1-00158.x
B. APG [Angiosperm Phylogeny Group] 1998: An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. – Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85: 531 – 553
C. APG [Angiosperm Phylogeny Group] 2009: An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. – Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 161: 105-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.x
D. Baillon, H. 1887: LXXVII. Chénopodiacées, 130 – 217. – In: Histoire des plantes 9. – Paris: Hachette
E. Borsch, T. & Barthlott, W. 1998: Structure and evolution of metareticulate pollen. – Grana 37: 68 – 78
F. Brockington, S. F., Alexandre, R., Ramdial, J., Moore, M. J., Crawley, S., Dhingra, A., Hilu, K., Douglas, E. S. & Soltis, P.S. 2009: Phylogeny of the Caryophyllales sensu lato: Revisiting hypotheses on pollination biology and perianth differentiation in the core Caryophyllales. – International Journal of Plant Sciences 170(5): 627–643. https://doi.org/10.1086/597785
G. Cuénoud, P. & al. 2002: Molecular phylogenetics of Caryophyllales based on nuclear 18S rDNA and plastid rbcL, atpB, and matK DNA sequences. – American Journal of Botany 89(1): 132-144. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.89.1.132
H. Downie, S. R., Katz-Downie, D. S. & Cho, K.-J. 1997: Relationships in the Caryophyllales as suggested by phylogenetic analyses of partial chloroplast DNA ORF2280 homolog sequences. – American Journal of Botany 84: 253-273. https://doi.org/10.2307/2446087
I. Endlicher, S. L. 1841: Amarantaceae, p. 1377. – In: Genera plantarum secudum ordines naturales disposita. – Vindobonae: Fr. Beck.
J. Hernández-Ledesma, P., Berendsohn, W. G., Borsch, T., von Mering, S., Akhani, H., Arias, S., Castañeda-Noa, I., Eggli, U., Eriksson, R., Flores-Olvera, H., Fuentes-Bazán, S., Kadereit, G., Klak, C., Korotkova, N., Nyffeler, R., Ocampo, G. & Ochoterena, H. 2015: A taxonomic backbone for the global synthesis of species diversity in the angiosperm order Caryophyllales. – Willdenowia 45(3): 281-383. https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.45.45301
K. Kadereit, G., Borsch, T., Weising, K. & Freitag, H. E. 2003: Phylogeny of Amaranthaceae and Chenopodiaceae and the evolution of C4 photosynthesis. – International Journal of Plant Sciences 164: 959–986. https://doi.org/10.1086/378649
L. Mallingson, F. 1922: Serodiagnostische Untersuchungen über die Verwandtschaften innerhalb des Centrospermen-Astes des Pflanzenreiches. – Botanisches Archiv 1: 2-20
M. Manhart, J. R. & Rettig, J. H. 1994: Gene sequence data, 235 – 246. – In: Behnke, H. D. & Mavry, T. J. (ed.), Caryophyllales. Evolution and systematics. – Berlin: Springer
N. Masson, R. & Kadereit, G. 2013: Phylogeny of Polycnemoideae (Amaranthaceae): Implications for biogeography, character evolution and taxonomy. – Taxon 62(1): 100-111. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.621009
O. Moquin-Tandon, C. H. B. A. 1849: Amarantaceae, 231-424, 462-463. – In: Candolle A. de (ed.), Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis 13(2). – Parisiis: Victoris Masson
P. Müller, K. F. & Borsch, T. 2005: Multiple origins of a unique pollen feature: stellate pore ornamentation in Amaranthaceae. – Grana 44: 266 – 281
Q. Müller, K. F. & Borsch, T. 2005: Phylogenetics of Amaranthaceae based on matK/trnK sequence data – Evidence from parsimony, likelihood, and bayesian analyses. – Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 92: 66 – 102
R. Schinz, H. 1893: Amaranthaceae, pp. 91–118. – In: Engler, A. & Prantl, K., Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien 3(1a). – Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann
S. Schäferhoff, B., Müller, K.F. & Borsch, T. 2010: Caryophyllales phylogenetics: disentangling Phytolaccaceae and Molluginaceae and description of Microteaceae as a new isolated family. – Willdenowia 39: 209-228. https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.39.39201
T. Scott, A. J. 1977: Reinstatement and revision of Salicorniaceae J. Agardh (Caryophyllales). – Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 75(4): 357-374. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1977.tb01493.x
U. Sánchez-del Pino, I., Borsch, T. & Motley, T.J. 2009: trnL-F and rpl16 sequence data and dense taxon sampling reveal monophyly of unilocular anthered Gomphrenoideae (Amaranthaceae) and an improved picture of their internal relationships. – Systematic Botany 34(1): 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1600/036364409787602401