Lobivia

Primary tabs

Lobivia

Lobivia Britton & Rose, Cactaceae 3: 49. 1922 sec. Hunt 20161 wfo-4000022042
      Type: Lobivia pentlandii (Hook.) Britton & Rose
  • 1. Hunt, D.R. 2016: CITES Cactaceae Checklist. 3rd edition. – published by the author
  • =Andenea Kreuz., Verzeichnis Amer. Sukk. Rev. Syst. Kakteen: 34. 1935 syn. sec. Backeberg 19592 wfo-4000001947
      • Type: Andenea gregeri Kreuz.
  • 2. Backeberg, C. 1959: Cactaceae 3. – Jena: VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag
  • =Mesechinopsis Y.Itô, Explan. Diagr. Austroechinocactinae: 286. 1957 syn. sec. Korotkova 20213 wfo-4000023837
  • 3. Korotkova, N. 2021: Revisions of Deamia, Disocactus, Epiphyllum, Hatiora, Kimnachia, Lepismium, Leuenbergeria, Lymanbensonia, Pereskia, Pfeiffera, Pseudorhipsalis, Rhipsalidopsis, Rhipsalis, Schlumbergera, Selenicereus, Strophocactus, Weberocereus, and various other names. In: Korotkova N. & al., Cactaceae at Caryophyllales.org – a dynamic online species-level taxonomic backbone for the family. – Willdenowia 51: 250-270. https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.51.51208
  • =Neolobivia Y.Itô, Explan. Diagr. Austroechinocactinae: 284. 1957 syn. sec. Korotkova 20214 wfo-4000025752
  • 4. Korotkova, N. 2021: Revisions of Deamia, Disocactus, Epiphyllum, Hatiora, Kimnachia, Lepismium, Leuenbergeria, Lymanbensonia, Pereskia, Pfeiffera, Pseudorhipsalis, Rhipsalidopsis, Rhipsalis, Schlumbergera, Selenicereus, Strophocactus, Weberocereus, and various other names. In: Korotkova N. & al., Cactaceae at Caryophyllales.org – a dynamic online species-level taxonomic backbone for the family. – Willdenowia 51: 250-270. https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.51.51208
  • =Cinnabarinea Frič ex F.Ritter, Kakteen Südamerika 2: 633. 1980 syn. sec. Korotkova 20215 wfo-4000008338
      • Type: Cinnabarinea cinnabarina (Hook.) Frič ex F.Ritter
  • 5. Korotkova, N. 2021: Revisions of Deamia, Disocactus, Epiphyllum, Hatiora, Kimnachia, Lepismium, Leuenbergeria, Lymanbensonia, Pereskia, Pfeiffera, Pseudorhipsalis, Rhipsalidopsis, Rhipsalis, Schlumbergera, Selenicereus, Strophocactus, Weberocereus, and various other names. In: Korotkova N. & al., Cactaceae at Caryophyllales.org – a dynamic online species-level taxonomic backbone for the family. – Willdenowia 51: 250-270. https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.51.51208

Content

Notes

Excluded from Echinopsis by Schlumpberger & Renner (2012); cf. Hunt (2016), CITES Cactaceae Checklist 3rd edition; see also note under Echinopsis.A,B,C

Taxon standing

Category B. The genus is monophyletic based on phylogenetic studies that support the clade based on a sufficiently dense or even complete sampling, or support a monotypic genus as a distinct lineage, but do not provide a new taxonomic treatment at the species level. In many cases, older classical taxonomic synopses or a monographic treatment exist for these genera providing a reliable assessment of the species included.

Acknowledgments

Revised by Boris O. Schlumpberger

Bibliography

A. Hunt, D.R. 2016: CITES Cactaceae Checklist. 3rd edition. – published by the author
B. Schlumpberger, B. & Renner, S. 2012: Molecular phylogenetics of Echinopsis (Cactaceae): Polyphyly at all levels and convergent evolution of pollination modes and growth forms. – American Journal of Botany 99(8): 1335-1349
C. Schlumpberger, B. 2021: Revisions of Acanthocalycium, Echinopsis, Leucostele, Lobivia, Setiechinopsis, Soehrensia, Reicheocactus, Trichocereus. – In: Korotkova N. & al., Cactaceae at Caryophyllales.org – a dynamic online species-level taxonomic backbone for the family. – Willdenowia 51: 251-270. https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.51.51208