Eriosyce

Primary tabs

Eriosyce

Eriosyce Phil. in Anales Univ. Chile 41: 721. 1872 sec. Guerrero & al. 20201
  • 1. Guerrero, P.C., Walter, H.E., Arroyo, Mary T.K., Peña, Carol M., Tamburrino, I., De Benidictis, M. & Larridon, I. 2020: Molecular phylogeny of the large South American genus Eriosyce (Notocacteae, Cactaceae): Generic delimitation and proposed changes in infrageneric and species ranks. – Taxon 68(3): 557-573. http://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12066
  • 2. Hunt, D.R. 2006: The New Cactus Lexicon. – Milborne Port: dh books
  • =Friesia Frič ex Kreuz. in Möller's Deutsche Gärtn.-Zeitung 44: 253-254. 1929, nom. illeg., syn. sec. Kew WCVP (2019)3
  • 3. Kew WCVP (2019)
  • =Pyrrhocactus A.Berger, Kakteen: 215, 345. 1929 syn. sec. Hunt 20064
  • 4. Hunt, D.R. 2006: The New Cactus Lexicon. – Milborne Port: dh books
  • =Chileocactus Frič in Kaktusář 2: 21. 1931 syn. sec. Kew WCVP (2019)5
  • 5. Kew WCVP (2019)
  • 6. Hunt, D.R. 2006: The New Cactus Lexicon. – Milborne Port: dh books
  • =Chileniopsis Backeb., Kaktus-ABC: 283, 416. 1936 ["1935"] syn. sec. Kew WCVP (2019)7
  • 7. Kew WCVP (2019)
  • =Chilenia Backeb. in Blätt. Kakteenf. 1938(6): 21. 1938 syn. sec. Guerrero & al. 20208
  • 8. Guerrero, P.C., Walter, H.E., Arroyo, Mary T.K., Peña, Carol M., Tamburrino, I., De Benidictis, M. & Larridon, I. 2020: Molecular phylogeny of the large South American genus Eriosyce (Notocacteae, Cactaceae): Generic delimitation and proposed changes in infrageneric and species ranks. – Taxon 68(3): 557-573. http://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12066
  • =Chiliorebutia Frič in Succulenta (Netherlands) 20: 55. 1938 syn. sec. Kew WCVP (2019)9
  • 9. Kew WCVP (2019)
  • 10. Hunt, D.R. 2006: The New Cactus Lexicon. – Milborne Port: dh books
  • =Nichelia Bullock in Bull. Misc. Inform. Kew 1938: 297. 1938 syn. sec. Kew WCVP (2019)11
  • 11. Kew WCVP (2019)
  • =Euporteria Kreuz. & Buining in Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 50: 200. 1941 syn. sec. Kew WCVP (2019)12
  • 12. Kew WCVP (2019)
  • =Hildmannia Kreuz. & Buining in Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 50: 204. 1941 syn. sec. Kew WCVP (2019)13
  • 13. Kew WCVP (2019)
  • 14. Hunt, D.R. 2006: The New Cactus Lexicon. – Milborne Port: dh books
  • =Dracocactus Y.Itô in Bull. Takarazuka Insectarium 71: ?. 1950 syn. sec. Kew WCVP (2019)15
  • 15. Kew WCVP (2019)
  • =Neotanahashia Y.Itô, Expl. Diagr.: 113. 1957 syn. sec. Kew WCVP (2019)16
  • 16. Kew WCVP (2019)
  • =Netanahashia Y.Itô, Expl. Diagr.: 290. 1957 syn. sec. Kew WCVP (2019)17
  • 17. Kew WCVP (2019)
  • 18. Hunt, D.R. 2006: The New Cactus Lexicon. – Milborne Port: dh books
  • =Chileorebutia Frič ex F.Ritter in Cactus (Paris) 66: 5. 1960 syn. sec. TROPICOS 1988+19
  • 19. TROPICOS 1988+: Tropicos.org. Missouri Botanical Garden – https://tropicos.org
  • 20. TROPICOS 1988+: Tropicos.org. Missouri Botanical Garden – https://tropicos.org
  • =Rodentiophila F.Ritter & Y.Itô in Itô, Cactaceae: 429. 1981 syn. sec. Kew WCVP (2019)21
  • 21. Kew WCVP (2019)
  • Bridgesia Backeb. in Blätt. Kakteenf. 1934(3): 5. 1934, nom. inval., syn. sec. ???22,23
  • 22. sine descr., 23. IPNI 2000+: International Plant Names Index. – The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Harvard University Herbaria & Libraries and Australian National Botanic Gardens – http://www.ipni.org: 10 mar 2021

Notes

Phylogenetics: The diminutive Eriosyce laui Lüthy from North Chile has been found to differ morphologically from the remaining taxa of Eriosyce s.l. by Nyffeler & Eggli (1997), and was subsequently segregated as the monotypic genus Rimacactus. This segregation is backed up by molecular data of Guerrero & al. (2020).
Key literature: Recent treatments by Kattermann (1994) and Hoffmann & Walter (2005; Chile), Guerrero & al. (2019)A

Taxon standing

Category B. The genus is monophyletic based on phylogenetic studies that support the clade based on a sufficiently dense or even complete sampling, or support a monotypic genus as a distinct lineage, but do not provide a new taxonomic treatment at the species level. In many cases, older classical taxonomic synopses or a monographic treatment exist for these genera providing a reliable assessment of the species included.

Acknowledgments

Revised by Pablo C. Guerrero

Bibliography

A. Guerrero, P.C. 2021: Revisions of Eriosyce, Eulychnia, Copiapoa, Rimacactus. – In: Korotkova N. & al., Cactaceae at Caryophyllales.org – a dynamic online species-level taxonomic backbone for the family. – Willdenowia 51: 2051-270. http://doi.org/10.3372/wi.51.51208