Aylostera

Primary tabs

Aylostera

Aylostera Speg. in Anales Soc. Ci. Argent. 96: 75. 1923 sec. Ritz & al. 20161 wfo-4000003804
      Nametype: Aylostera pseudominuscula (Speg.) Speg.
  • 1. Ritz, C.M., Fickenscher, K., Föller, J., Herrmann, K., Mecklenburg, R. & Wahl, R. 2016: Molecular phylogenetic relationships of the Andean genus Aylostera Speg. (Cactaceae, Trichocereeae), a new classification and a morphological identification key. – Plant Systematics and Evolution 302(7): 763-780. 10.1007/s00606-016-1296-4
  • =Mediolobivia Backeb. in Blätt. Kakteenf. 1934(2): 3. 1934 syn. sec. Ritz & al. 20162 wfo-4000023444
    • Nametype: Mediolobivia aureiflora (Backeb.) Backeb.
  • 2. Ritz, C.M., Fickenscher, K., Föller, J., Herrmann, K., Mecklenburg, R. & Wahl, R. 2016: Molecular phylogenetic relationships of the Andean genus Aylostera Speg. (Cactaceae, Trichocereeae), a new classification and a morphological identification key. – Plant Systematics and Evolution 302(7): 763-780. 10.1007/s00606-016-1296-4
  • =Digitorebutia Frič & Kreuz. ex Buining in Succulenta (Netherlands) 22. 1940 syn. sec. Ritz & al. 20163 wfo-4000011703
    • Nametype: Digitorebutia haagei (Frič & Schelle) Frič ex Buining
  • 3. Ritz, C.M., Fickenscher, K., Föller, J., Herrmann, K., Mecklenburg, R. & Wahl, R. 2016: Molecular phylogenetic relationships of the Andean genus Aylostera Speg. (Cactaceae, Trichocereeae), a new classification and a morphological identification key. – Plant Systematics and Evolution 302(7): 763-780. 10.1007/s00606-016-1296-4

Notes

The phylogenetic relationships in Aylostera were studied in detail by Ritz et al. (2016) based on the plastid DNA regions atpB-rbcL and trnS-trnG as well as AFLPs and morphological characters. Aylostera was confirmed as monophyletic and as distantly related to the clade that contains the type species of Rebutia K.Schum., thus justifying recognizing Aylostera as a separate genus. Based on their results, the authors suggested a new classification of Aylostera with nine species, this classification is followed here.A,B

Taxon standing

Category A. The genus is monophyletic based on a complete or very comprehensive phylogenetic study, and a phylogeny-based taxonomic synopsis was published.B

Acknowledgments

Revised by Urs Eggli

Bibliography

A. Korotkova, N. 2021: Revisions of Deamia, Disocactus, Epiphyllum, Hatiora, Kimnachia, Lepismium, Leuenbergeria, Lymanbensonia, Pereskia, Pfeiffera, Pseudorhipsalis, Rhipsalidopsis, Rhipsalis, Schlumbergera, Selenicereus, Strophocactus, Weberocereus, and various other names. In: Korotkova N. & al., Cactaceae at Caryophyllales.org – a dynamic online species-level taxonomic backbone for the family. – Willdenowia 51: 250-270. https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.51.51208
B. Ritz, C.M., Fickenscher, K., Föller, J., Herrmann, K., Mecklenburg, R. & Wahl, R. 2016: Molecular phylogenetic relationships of the Andean genus Aylostera Speg. (Cactaceae, Trichocereeae), a new classification and a morphological identification key. – Plant Systematics and Evolution 302(7): 763-780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-016-1296-4