Rhipsalidopsis gaertneri

Primary tabs

Rhipsalidopsis gaertneri

Rhipsalidopsis gaertneri (Regel) Linding. in Beih. Bot. Centralbl. 61A: 378. 1942 sec. Korotkova & al. 20111 wfo-0001433963
  • Epiphyllum russellianum var. gaertneri Regel in Gartenflora 33: 323. 1884 syn. sec. Korotkova 20212 wfo-0000670234
  • Epiphyllum gaertneri K.Schum., Fl. Bras. 4(2): 218. 1890 syn. sec. Barthlott & Taylor 19953 wfo-0000670179
  • Phyllocactus gaertneri (Regel) K.Schum., Sukkulenten: 147. 1892 syn. sec. Barthlott & Taylor 19953 wfo-0000397907
  • Schlumbergera gaertneri (Regel) Britton & Rose in Contr. U.S. Natl. Herb. 16: 260. 1913 syn. sec. Barthlott & Taylor 19953 wfo-0001220361
  • Rhipsalis gaertneri (Regel) Vaupel, Nat. Pflanzenfam., ed. 2, 21: 619. 1925 syn. sec. Barthlott & Taylor 19953 wfo-0000406231
  • Epiphyllopsis gaertneri (Regel) A.Berger ex Backeb. & F.M.Knuth, Kaktus-ABC: 158. 1936 ["1935"] syn. sec. Barthlott & Taylor 19953 wfo-0001252054
  • Rhipsalidopsis gaertneri (Regel) Moran in Gentes Herbarum 8: 339. 1953 syn. sec. Korotkova & al. 20111 wfo-0000399855
  • Hatiora gaertneri (Regel) Barthlott in Bradleya 5: 100. 1987 syn. sec. ??? wfo-0001239336
    • Type: Brazil, Santa Catarina, Blumenau, Gärtner (not known whether preserved); Lectotype (designated by Barthlott & Taylor 1995: 744): [icon.] Regel in Gartenflora 33: tab. 1172. 1884
  • 1. Korotkova, N., Borsch, T., Quandt, D., Taylor, N. P., Müller, K. & Barthlott, W. 2011: What does it take to resolve relationships and to identify species with molecular markers? An example from the epiphytic Rhipsalideae (Cactaceae). – American Journal of Botany 98(9): 1549-1572. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1000502, 2. Korotkova, N. 2021: Revisions of Deamia, Disocactus, Epiphyllum, Hatiora, Kimnachia, Lepismium, Leuenbergeria, Lymanbensonia, Pereskia, Pfeiffera, Pseudorhipsalis, Rhipsalidopsis, Rhipsalis, Schlumbergera, Selenicereus, Strophocactus, Weberocereus, and various other names. In: Korotkova N. & al., Cactaceae at Caryophyllales.org – a dynamic online species-level taxonomic backbone for the family. – Willdenowia 51: 250-270. https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.51.51208, 3. Barthlott, W. & Taylor, N. P. 1995: Notes towards a monograph of Rhipsalideae (Cactaceae). – Bradleya 13: 43-79. https://doi.org/10.25223/brad.n13.1995.a7, 4. Barthlott, W. & Taylor, N. P. 1995: Notes towards a monograph of Rhipsalideae (Cactaceae). – Bradleya 13: 43-79 https://doi.org/10.25223/brad.n13.1995.a7
  • =Epiphyllum makoyanum W.Watson in Gard. and Forest 2: 243. 1889 syn. sec. Britton & Rose 19235 wfo-0000670198
  • 5. Britton, N. L. & Rose, J.N. 1923: Cactaceae 4.
  • =Rhipsalidopsis serrata Linding. in Beih. Bot. Centralbl. 61(3): 379. 1942 syn. sec. Barthlott & Taylor 19956 wfo-0001258821
  • Epiphyllopsis gaertneri var. serrata (Lindgr.) Backeb., Cactaceae 2: 724. 1959 syn. sec. Korotkova 20217 wfo-0001430878
  • Hatiora gaertneri f. serrata (Linding.) Süpplie, Rhipsalidinae: 63. 1990, nom. inval. syn. sec. Anderson 20059 wfo-00007161688
  • 6. Barthlott, W. & Taylor, N. P. 1995: Notes towards a monograph of Rhipsalideae (Cactaceae). – Bradleya 13: 43-79. https://doi.org/10.25223/brad.n13.1995.a7, 7. Korotkova, N. 2021: Revisions of Deamia, Disocactus, Epiphyllum, Hatiora, Kimnachia, Lepismium, Leuenbergeria, Lymanbensonia, Pereskia, Pfeiffera, Pseudorhipsalis, Rhipsalidopsis, Rhipsalis, Schlumbergera, Selenicereus, Strophocactus, Weberocereus, and various other names. In: Korotkova N. & al., Cactaceae at Caryophyllales.org – a dynamic online species-level taxonomic backbone for the family. – Willdenowia 51: 250-270. https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.51.51208, 8. Art. 33.3, 36.1, 9. Anderson, E. F. 2005: Das große Kakteen-Lexikon. – Stuttgart: Ulmer
  • =Epiphyllopsis gaertneri var. tiburtii Backeb. & Voll in Arch. Jard. Bot. Rio de Janeiro 9: 149. 1949 syn. sec. ??? wfo-0000670143
  • Rhipsalidopsis gaertneri var. tiburtii (Backeb. & Voll) Moran in Gentes Herbarum 8(4): 342. 1953 syn. sec. Anderson 200510 wfo-0001252055
  • 10. Anderson, E. F. 2005: Das große Kakteen-Lexikon. – Stuttgart: Ulmer

Distribution (Area)

Brazil nativeA,B

Distribution (General)

Brazil: Paraná, Santa Catarina. Reports in the literature of its occurrence in the states of Minas Gerais and São Paulo seem to be incorrect.C

Ecology

Epiphytic in seasonal Atlantic forest, at 350-1300 m altitudeC

Descriptions (aggregated)

Old stem segment duration: deciduous [1]; stem width: 2.5 cm [1]; stem shape: flattened [1] entire plant habitat: epiphytic [1]; entire plant orientation: semierect [1], pendent [1]; entire plant branching: acrotonic [1]; entire plant pubescence: bristly [1] flower quantity per areol contemporaneously: 12; flower coloration: red [1], bright rose pink [1]; flower architecture: actinomorphic [1]; flower position: apical [1]; flower size qualitativ: large [1] areole prominence: superficial [1] fruit coloration: red [1] bud orientation: oblique [1]
A single or the first number in square brackets denotes sample size

Bibliography

A. Barthlott, W. & Taylor, N. P. 1995: Notes towards a monograph of Rhipsalideae (Cactaceae). – Bradleya 13: 43-79. https://doi.org/10.25223/brad.n13.1995.a7 (as Hatiora gaertneri (Regel) Barthlott)
B. Zappi, D. & Taylor, N. P. 2020+: Cactaceae in Flora e Funga do Brasil. – Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro – http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br
C. Barthlott, W. & Taylor, N. P. 1995: Notes towards a monograph of Rhipsalideae (Cactaceae). – Bradleya 13: 43-79. https://doi.org/10.25223/brad.n13.1995.a7