Rhipsalis micrantha f. kirbergii

Primary tabs

Rhipsalis micrantha f. kirbergii

Rhipsalis micrantha f. kirbergii (Barthlott) Süpplie, Rhipsalidinae, ed. 4: 100. 1994 sec. Korotkova & al. 20111
  • ≡Rhipsalis kirbergii Barthlott in Trop. Subtrop. Pflanzenwelt 10: 11. 1974 syn. sec. Barthlott & Taylor 19952
  • ≡Rhipsalis micrantha f. kirbergii (Barthlott) Barthlott & N.P.Taylor in Bradleya 13: 62. 1995 syn. sec. Korotkova 20213
    • Holotype: Ecuador, Prov. Manabi, 10km N Chone, 2000 m, 1973, Rauh & Barthlott 34364 (HEID, holo., B, iso., in spirit)
    • Isotype: Ecuador, Prov. Manabi, Westecuador, Küstentiefland bei Chone, 10 kn nördl. Chone, alt. 200 m, 29 Jul 1973, W. Rauh & W. Barthlott 34364 (B, in spirit: B 81 0013235)
    • Holotype: not designated
  • 1. Korotkova, N., Borsch, T., Quandt, D., Taylor, N. P., Müller, K. & Barthlott, W. 2011: What does it take to resolve relationships and to identify species with molecular markers? An example from the epiphytic Rhipsalideae (Cactaceae). – American Journal of Botany 98(9): 1549-1572. http://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1000502, 2. Barthlott, W. & Taylor, N. P. 1995: Notes towards a monograph of Rhipsalideae (Cactaceae). – Bradleya 13: 43-79. http://doi.org/10.25223/brad.n13.1995.a7, 3. Korotkova, N. 2021: Revisions of Deamia, Disocactus, Epiphyllum, Hatiora, Kimnachia, Lepismium, Leuenbergeria, Lymanbensonia, Pereskia, Pfeiffera, Pseudorhipsalis, Rhipsalidopsis, Rhipsalis, Schlumbergera, Selenicereus, Strophocactus, Weberocereus, and various other names. In: Korotkova N. & al., Cactaceae at Caryophyllales.org – a dynamic online species-level taxonomic backbone for the family. – Willdenowia 51: 250-270. http://doi.org/10.3372/wi.51.51208
  • =Rhipsalis tonduzii F.A.C.Weber in Bois, Dict. Hort.: 1046. 1898 syn. sec. Barthlott & Taylor 19954
  • =Rhipsalis kirbergii var. monticola Barthlott in Trop. Subtrop. Pflanzenwelt 10: 11. 1974 syn. sec. Korotkova 20215
    • Holotype: Ecuador, c. 5 km südlich Loja, Südequador. Epilithisch auf Felsen und epiphytisch in dichtem Gebüsch, in Gemeinschaft mit großen epiphytischen Tilandsien aus der T. fendleri-Gruppe und T. straminea, alt. 2000 m, 15 Sep 1973, W. Rauh & W. Barthlott 35234 (HEID)
  • 5. Korotkova, N. 2021: Revisions of Deamia, Disocactus, Epiphyllum, Hatiora, Kimnachia, Lepismium, Leuenbergeria, Lymanbensonia, Pereskia, Pfeiffera, Pseudorhipsalis, Rhipsalidopsis, Rhipsalis, Schlumbergera, Selenicereus, Strophocactus, Weberocereus, and various other names. In: Korotkova N. & al., Cactaceae at Caryophyllales.org – a dynamic online species-level taxonomic backbone for the family. – Willdenowia 51: 250-270. http://doi.org/10.3372/wi.51.51208

Content

Distribution (General)

Ecuador, Costa RicaA

Description

A form with long-pendulous, 4-6-ribbed/angled stem-segments.A

Descriptions (aggregated)

Old stem segment duration: deciduous [1]; stem width: 0.4–0.7 cm; stem shape: angled [1] entire plant habitat: epiphytic [1]; entire plant orientation: pendent [1]; entire plant branching: acrotonic [1]; entire plant pubescence: sparse pubescent [1] flower quantity per areol contemporaneously: 1 [1]; flower coloration: whitish [1]; flower architecture: actinomorphic [1]; flower position: subapical [1], lateral [1]; flower size qualitativ: minute [1]; flower size quantitativ: 6–8 mm areole prominence: superficial [1] fruit coloration: whitish [1]; fruit shape: globose [1] bud orientation: perpendicular [1]
A single or the first number in square brackets denotes sample size

Bibliography

A. Barthlott, W. & Taylor, N. P. 1995: Notes towards a monograph of Rhipsalideae (Cactaceae). – Bradleya 13: 43-79. http://doi.org/10.25223/brad.n13.1995.a7